Diversity… We are human (sic), building our Last Database destinies, with different perspectives, without distinctions of gender and beliefs... ». Linked to feminist, environmental and indigenous rights social movements, the independent Last Database conventionalists who drafted the second version of the preamble have had a preponderant presence in the media. These are leaders who managed to "make flesh" the story of the Last Database October 2019 outbreak and who achieved.
Through regular Last Database mobilizations in Plaza Italia —renamed Plaza Dignidad—, a strong social legitimacy, in addition to a clear media presence. . Although their unexpected electoral success is explained by a series of circumstantial elements, it is Last Database clear that these leaders were the ones who managed to express an idea that had been around public debate for a long time: that the victims of a " coalition of abuse» (businessmen, politicians, economists, etc.) could seize power from an indolent elite. And there is Last Database nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come. But the problem is that times change. An uncertain scenario According to opinion polls.
The intention to Last Database vote for the approval of the constitutional text has fallen consistently. At this point, all polls show a slight edge for rejection. Furthermore, the surveys show that the main reason for this attitude stems from the negative opinion of the way in which the Last Database Convention works, 55% of those consulted mention distrust in the constituents as the main source of rejection, and 40% general disagreement with approved proposals. To a large extent, this negative judgment is due to the various performances Last Database carried out during the debate by some conventionalists. What at first seemed picturesque and striking has ended up generating a certain restlessness. On the other hand, for several of these referents it was important to present maximalist, striking and symbolic proposals.